Kim Yo Jong, deputy department director of the Central Committee of the Workers’ Party of Korea, said on the 13th, in response to the South Korean government’s outlook for easing inter-Korean tensions, that “no matter how fanciful the pipe dream, the reality of inter-Korean relations does not change.”
In a statement released that day through the Korean Central News Agency, she took issue with the Ministry of Unification’s assessment of North Korea’s earlier statement as having ‘left room for communication and easing tensions,’ calling it “beyond compare in its pitifulness” and saying “they were off the mark from the very outset.”
She continued, “If we speak of the various hope-inflated pipe dreams of ‘improving inter-Korean relations’ being schemed up in Seoul, they are nothing more than unrealizable delusions.”
She also, referring to President Lee Jae-myung’s overseas tour, stated that “no matter how the ruler runs around abroad soliciting favors, and no matter how the authorities put on a show of goodwill while dreaming a pipe dream, the reality of inter-Korean relations can never change.”
Kim asserted, “In reality, South Korea recently committed a grave act of provocation that infringes the DPRK’s sovereignty,” reiterating the claim of a South Korea-origin drone’s intrusion into its airspace, and added, “It is something that could only be done by an enemy.”
She declared, “Let me make it clear once again to the thugs of the hostile country,” and said, “The Seoul authorities must acknowledge and apologize for the provocation that infringed upon the Republic’s sovereignty and put in place measures to prevent a recurrence.”
She also said, “Do not forget that if provocations against the sacred and inviolable sovereignty of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea are repeated, an unbearable price will be paid.” She added, “This is not a mere rhetorical threat or an extension of a war of words,” and, “Our response to violations of sovereignty and our will to defend sovereignty will not remain confined to proportional responses or to statements of position.”
submitted by /u/Substantial-Owl8342
[link] [comments]
