Greenland framework’s lessons for the ROK-US alliance

U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent decision in Davos to withdraw proposed high tariffs on European goods was widely interpreted as a welcome easing of trade tensions. On its own, that reading would be reasonable. But viewed alongside the simultaneously unveiled “Framework for the Future of Greenland,” the move points to something far more significant: a fundamental shift in how the United States now defines and manages its alliances. At the core of the Greenland framework are open-ended commitments and the deployment of a U.S.-led missile defense system. While Denmark formally retains legal ownership of the territory, effective control over strategically important rare earth resources and key security prerogatives rests largely with Washington. This separation between legal form and strategic substance reflects a new model of alliance management — one focused less on symbolism and more on redistributing security burdens and control. It would be a mistake to interpret this shift as merely a reflection of Trump’s personality. The so-called “Trump phenomenon” is better und

Latest News from Korea

Latest Entertainment from Korea

Learn People & History of Korea