South Korea’s National Assembly on Thursday passed an amendment to the Commercial Act to expand boards of directors’ fiduciary duties to minority shareholders.
The move drew strong criticism from business leaders, who warn it would expose a greater number of companies, especially smaller ones, to management disputes and foster a risk-averse culture.
Despite opposition from the ruling People Power Party, the liberal Democratic Party, which holds a parliamentary majority, pushed ahead with the bill.
It added a clause that requires directors to fulfill their fiduciary obligation in the best interest of shareholders. Under the current law, the duties apply only to the companies themselves.
Given the potential ramifications of the new law, however, Acting President and Finance Minister Choi Sang-mok is widely expected to veto the bill.
The Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KCCI) and the Federation of Korean Industries – the country’s two main business lobby groups — urged Choi to reject the amended bill.
However, the Democratic Party could revisit the bill if impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol is removed from office by a Constitutional Court’s ruling expected this month.
KOREA DISCOUNT
The main opposition party stated that the amendment aims to protect minority shareholders’ rights in corporate decisions such as M&As and business spin-offs that sometimes depress share prices.
Thus, the legislation would address the Korea Discount – the persistent undervaluation of South Korean companies relative to their intrinsic values, the Democratic Party added.
But large business owners warn it could leave them more vulnerable to legal action from individual shareholders alleging neglect of duty if their share prices fall.
They could face not only liability of damages but also criminal charges of breach of trust under the legislative measure, in case their M&A goes awry.
“Given that all new businesses and M&As cannot guarantee success, the new law will create a risk-averse culture,” said a chief executive officer of a South Korean business group.
“It will lead to a decline in corporate value over the long term, rather than tackling the Korea Discount,” he added.
Developed countries such as the US, UK, France, German and Japan have no laws explicitely requiring board members to act in the best interest of shareholders.
The legislative move comes as activist funds are exercising ever-increasing clout over critical corporate decisions, pressuring companies to prioritize short-term profits over investments in new growth areas.
With the ascent of local activist funds and private equity firms, an unprecedentedly high number of South Korean corporations have become targets of hostile takeover attempts, or have been embroiled in management disputes over the past two decades.
The number of public disclosures related to fights for management control, including legal battles, reached 315 involving 87 listed companies in 2024, according to the KCCI.
In terms of the number of disclosures, 2024 saw the highest in five years.
REVISING CAPITAL MARKETS ACT?
The law revision addressed growing calls to strengthen corporate responsibility in management. Some business groups angered minority shareholders by merging a financially troubled company with a profit-making affiliate to improve up its financial structure.
Other companies spun off lucrative business into separate entities and list the spin-offs on the stock exchange, a move seen aimed at raising fresh capital.
However, business leaders argued that those issues could be addressed by amending the Capital Markets Act, rather than revising the Commercial Act.
Reflecting this advice, the conservative ruling party proposed adding provisions to the Capital Markets Act that companies must make efforts to protect shareholders’ rights during mergers, or business spin-offs.
Also, the Peope Power Party suggests the companies spinning off some businesses and re-listing on the domestic stock market allocate 20% of their floated shares to the remaining company’s shareholders.
“The Capital Markets Act applies only to around 2,600 companies listed on the domestic stock market. But the Commercial Act applies to one million companies, regardless of listing status, leading to criticism that it constitutes ‘excessive legislation,” said a domestic company official.
By Bo-Hyung Kim and Jeong-Soo Hwang
Kph21c@hankyung.com
Yeonhee Kim edited this article.
