Working in the tech security field, I see AI as an indispensable tool. In my line of work, we use AI for everything from coding and security testing to the core architecture of security itself. While there is an ongoing debate about accountability—who is responsible when an AI-driven system fails?—the general consensus is that AI is the key to higher accuracy and efficiency. For us, most arguments against AI is issue of responsibility, and the pace of AI advancement is simply too fast to ignore.
However, I’ve noticed a starkly different reaction when it comes to AI in the creative world, such as AI-generated music videos. Many people hold a deeply negative view, perhaps because art is seen as the last bastion of humanity, a medium meant to express the human soul.
This backlash reminds me of the early days of CGI and Green Screens. Back then, many purists argued that using a green screen wasn’t “real” filmmaking and that such movies lacked artistic value. But today, CGI is recognized as a legitimate field of media art. We don’t strip a film of its artistic merit just because it used digital tools.
So, I wanna ask question.1. Where do u think we should draw line for ai using? (Whick specific area should be off limit to use AI and why?
- If an artist use AI to realize unique vision and final quality is indistinguishable from most humans, should they still be subject to criticism?
submitted by /u/PuzzleheadedDance968
[link] [comments]
