Yeouido financial district in Seoul
South Korea is seeking to introduce corporate pension plans to all workplaces in stages starting next year, alongside the mandatory contributions to the National Pension Service (NPS).
To boost returns on corporate pensions, the government is considering involving public pensions such as the NPS, the world’s No. 3 pension scheme, in their management.
To motivate small and medium-sized companies to implement retirement plans, the government is looking to offer subsidies, while imposing fines on business owners that fail to adopt the pension plans, according to government officials on Monday.
On June 20, Minister of Employment and Labor Lee Jung-sik will hold a closed-door meeting with Financial Supervisory Service Governor Lee Bok-hyun to discuss making the pension plans mandatory even for family businesses. The move requires law revisions.
(Graphics by Sunny Park)
Under the current law, companies established after 2012 must implement retirement pensions and those established before can operate either severance pay systems, or retirement pensions.
But the subscription rate for retirement pensions remains low, which regulators blamed on the absence of penalties to enforce it.
According to the Ministry of Strategy and Finance, only 26.8% of 1,595,000 workplaces in the country have adopted retirement pensions as of the end of 2022.
The government is considering first introducing retirement pension plans to workplaces with more than 100 employees from next year.
It then expands the system to smaller companies with 30 or more, but less than 100 employees within two years after the relevant law enforcement.
Companies with less than five full-time workers will be subject to the mandatory pension scheme within six years after the law came into force.
South Korea is considers offering incentives as follows for small and medium-sized companies to adopt employees’ pension plans
1. Provides subsidies, including the government covering about 10% of employers’ contributions
2. Waives pension management fees for a certain period of time
3. Involves public pension schemes such as the National Pension Service to manage pension plans on their behalf
Unlike severance pay, the retirement pension system can guarantee workers’ retirement pay even when the company’s financial situation worsens, such as bankruptcy.
South Korea has introduced corporate pension plans in the wake of the Asia financial crisis in the late 1990s, after a large number of companies went into bankruptcy and failed to pay severance.
Currently, companies must deposit 8.33% of the monthly income of employees employed for more than one year to financial companies. The subscription rate has been on the decline since 2019, however.
The retirement pension subscription rate at workplaces with 300 or more full-time workers reached 70.5% as of the end of 2022.
By comparison, only 30.0% of companies with five to nine employees, and 11.9% of businesses employing less than five employees contribute to retirement pensions.
The National Pension Service is the world’s third-largest pension fund
The Ministry of Employment and Labor commissioned a study early this month on measures it may implement to encourage small business owners to introduce corporate pension plans.
RATES OF RETURNS
Still, poor returns make them hesitant to adopt retirement pensions.
According to the Ministry of Employment and Labor, the average annual rate of return on retirement pensions over the past five years stands at only 2.35%.
That is far below the 3.6% gain in South Korae’s consumer prices in 2023 on average and the NPS’ 7.63% return over the same period.
The disappointing performance is attributed mainly to Korean pension subscribers’ tendency to put retirement money into deposits and safe-haven assets that guarantee principal payments.
They need to choose investment products on their own through outside financial services companies, whether they are a defined benefit plan or that of defined contribution.
To supplement the system, the government is understood to consider involving public institutions such as the NPS in managing corporate pensions.
By Kyung-Min Kang and Yong-Hee Kwak
kkm1026@hankyung.com
Yeonhee Kim edited this article
